Lance Vids: Reportable Transactions &; 419 Plans Litigation: CJA and associates 419, 412i section 79, audits for scams

Lance Vids: Reportable Transactions &; 419 Plans Litigation: CJA and associates 419, 412i section 79, audits for scams

1 comment:

  1. Understanding Captives

    Current Tax Issues with Captive Insurance Companies

    Large U.S. companies have been forming captive insurance companies since the 1950s. Basically such large captives are formed for one of three reasons;

    Some companies are not able to obtain necessary insurance coverage
    Some companies seek to obtain cheaper insurance
    Some companies seek to gain more control over their current insurance program
    History of Captive Insurance Companies

    The IRS defines a captive insurance company as a “wholly owned insurance subsidiary.” According to the case law of that time, companies started forming captives in the 1950s because they couldn’t find insurance, could only find very expensive insurance, or simply decided that forming their own insurance company made more sense. The taxpayers in both United States v. Weber Paper Co., 320 F.2d 199 (8th Cir. Mo. 1963) and Consumer’s Oil Corp. of Trenton, NJ v. United States, 188 F. Supp. 796 (NJ 1960) owned property for which they could not procure flood insurance, leading both to form an insurance company. While the taxpayer in Beech Aircraft Corp. v. United States, 797 F.2d 920 (10th Cir. Kan. 1986) did have an insurance policy, its carrier had complete control of its attorneys during litigation. When Beech was sued under a products liability claim in the early 1970s, it filed a motion to remove its insurer-appointed counsel several weeks before trial. The court denied this motion and Beech lost the case. Subsequently, Beech formed a captive to write its own insurance policy. Other cases provide similar examples.

    ReplyDelete